NYIPLA Presidents' Forum "Go Ask Alice - Can Patent Eligible Subject Matter Be Rehabilitated"
Closed
Event Date
- 9/24/2015 4:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Please arrive early for registration
Location
- Thurgood Marshall US Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
By invitation only.
Materials:
- Hypothetical
- Discussion Leaders' Biographies
- Attendees List
- Robert R. Sachs, “The One Year Anniversary: The Aftermath of #AliceStorm,” Bilski Blog (June 20, 2015) (11 pages)
- Christopher M. Holman, “Patent Eligibility Post-Myriad: A Reinvigorated Judicial Wildcard of Uncertain Effect,” 82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1796 (Nov. 2014) (37 pages)
- Robert P. Feinland et al., “Hope for Computer-Related Patents – Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank,” The National Law Review (June 24, 2015) (3 pages)
- Dennis Crouch, “Read This: USPTO’s New Examination Guidelines Subject Matter Eligibility Provide ‘Pathways to Eligibility,’” PatentlyO.com (July 30, 2015) (4 pages)
- USPTO 2014 Interim Eligibility Guidance Quick Reference Sheet (Dec. 2014) (3 pages) and (16 pages)
- USPTO Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility(July 2015) (11 pages)
- USPTO July 2015 Update: Interim Eligibility Guidance Quick Reference Sheet (July 2015) (2 pages)
- Friedrich Laub, Protection of Diagnostic Inventions After Ariosa v. Sequenom,” BNA Patent, Copyright & Trademark Journal (Aug. 14, 2015) (5 pages)
- Jeffrey A. Lefstin, “Ariosa v. Sequenom and the Path Ahead for Subject-Matter Eligibility,” PatentlyO.com (June 14, 2015) (3 pages)
- Daniel Nazer, “Deep Dive: Why We Need Venue Reform to Restore Fairness to Patent Litigation,” Electronic Frontier Foundation (Aug. 17, 2015) (5 pages)
- Rep. Issa Amendment to the 2015 Innovation Act (2 pages)
- Glenn Forbis, “The Ups and Downs of the Innovation Act of 2015,” IPWatchdog.com (May 27, 2015) (6 pages)
