Amicus Briefs

Tivo v. Echostar Corporation, No. 2009-1374, August 2, 2010. 
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association for En Banc rehearing in support of neither party.

Ontario v. Quon, No. 2008-1332, June 17, 2010.
Cited at page 11 of the SCOTUS Slip Opinion.

Hyatt v. Kappos, No. 2007-1066, December 14, 2009
Brief Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of plaintiff-appellant's combined petition for rehearing or rehearing En Banc.

Princo v. ITC and U.S. Philips Corporation, No. 2007-1386, December 7, 2009.
New York Intellectual Property Law Association's motion for leave to file brief Amicus Curiae in support of Philips' motion for rehearing En Banc and in opposition to Princo's motion for rehearing En Banc, and motion for leave to file overlength brief.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly, No. 2008-1248, October 15, 2009.
Brief of Amicus Curiae
New York Intellectual Property Law Association on En Banc rehearing in support of neither party.

Shire v. Sandoz, No. 2009-1180, July 22, 2009.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of Shire LLC and Affirmance.

Princo v. ITC and U.S. Philips Corporation, No. 2007-1386, July 2, 2009.
New York Intellectual Property Law Association's motion for leave to file brief Amicus Curiae in support of Philips' motion for rehearing En Banc and in opposition to Princo's motion for rehearing En Banc, and motion for leave to file overlength brief.

Princo v. ITC and U.S. Philips Corporation, No. 2007-1386, July 2, 2009.
New York Intellectual Property Law Association's motion for leave to file brief Amicus Curiae in support of Philips' motion for rehearing En Banc and in opposition to Princo's motion for rehearing En Banc, and motion for leave to file overlength brief.

Tafas v. Doll, No. 2008-1352, June 16, 2009.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Association in support of appellees' petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing En Banc.

Tafas et al. v. Dudas et al, No. 2008-1352, October 3, 2008.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of appellees.

Finisar Corp. v. DirectTV Group, Inc.,Nos. 2007-1023 and 2007-1024, November 5, 2007.
Reply brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party on cross-appeal.

Finisar Corp. v. DirectTV Group, Inc.,Nos. 2007-1023 and 2007-1024, June 20, 2007.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party on cross-appeal.

KSR International co., v. Teleflex Inc. and Technology Holding Co.,No. 2004-1350, October 16, 2006.
Brief for Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of respondents.

Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., No. 2005-608, July 26, 2006.
Brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association as Amicus Curiae in support of respondents.

Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., No. 2004-1329, August 4, 2005.
Brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association as Amicus Curiae in support of p
etitioners.

Merck KGaA v. Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd., No. 2003-1237, February 22, 2005.
Brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association as Amicus Curiae in support of petitioner.

US Philips v. International Trade Commission, No. 2004-1361, November 18, 2004.
New York Intellectual Property Law Association's reply brief as Amicus Curiae  in support of appellant U.S. Philips. 

Edward H. Phillips v AWH Corporation, Nos. 2003-1269 and 2003-1286, September 20, 2004.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association regarding the issue of claim construction, in which the Tennessee Bar Association and its IP Law Section, State Bar of Michigan IP Law Section, and Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association join.

US Phillips v. ITC, No. 2004-1361, August 27, 2004.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of appellent.

Andrx Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. The Kroger Co., No. 2003-779, December 29, 2003.
Motion of New York Intellectual Property Law Association and brief of Amicus Curiae in support of petitioner.

Knorr-Bremse Systems v. Dana Corp., Nos. 2001-1357, 2001-1376, 2002-1221, and 2002-1256, November 3, 2003.
Brief for Amicus Curiae  New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of eliminating the adverse inference arising from the assertion of attorney-client privilege in defense of willful infringement.

CSU L.L.C. v. Xerox Corp., No. 1999-1323, July 16, 1999.
Brief for Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of defendant-appellee.

Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, No. 1998-531, March 22, 1999.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of respondents.

Lehman v. Zurko, No. 1998-377, January 15, 1999.
Brief of Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of respondents.

In re Zurko, No. 1996-1258, October 30, 1997.
Brief for Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of reviewing patent and trademark office fact-finding under the clearly erroneous standard of review.

College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary, No. 1997-1246, October 27, 1997.
Motion for leave to file revised brief Amicus Curiae on behalf of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of plaintiff-appellee.